Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alan Langford's avatar

Let's be clear about one thing: "reductions in development charges" means putting the cost—and thus the tax burden of building infrastructure for new development—on the backs of everyone who pays municipal property taxes either directly or indirectly.

Moffat conveniently doesn't quantify "not profitable enough to build." If developers want to put forward their audited financial statements and let us know just how much profit they make on their projects, then it would be a balanced discussion, but to me this sounds very much like a private sector toady making the same biased arguments that always suggest the way forward is lower taxes for people who have already accumulated lots of capital at the detriment of the middle class, or what's left of it.

No posts

Ready for more?